>>3827405>the EVF won't show you "what you see is what you get" if you disable the profile.It will, it will show you what you get in the RAW which is arguably the most accurate thing it can show.
>they never intended for their vintage lenses to be corrected inside viewfinder.It has nothing to do with the viewfinder.
>They added 0 new sony lenses to their database, so my assumption was far from baseless.It was baseless indeed.
>Nah, I used Samyang as an example of someone who alreayd is capable of porting their catalog into RF.Most Samyang lenses aren't even chipped.
>They will sink a mount a abandon them if they are not profitable. There is no law that states all lenses must come to RF.There's the law of the free market. And there's probably contracts we don't know about that can act as incentives for them to not get into the mount.
>>3827408Correction profiles aren't used as metadata when it comes to the JPEG. The camera always shoots RAW, except that when you shoot in JPEG mode it applies whatever settings you have to the RAW data before converting to JPEG and storing it in the memory card.
>>3827409So you agree that when shooting RAW if there's corrections in the viewfinder what you see ISN'T what you get?
