>>3788732Neither of you clearly have any idea of what is even going on in this thread or the context. In almost the same breath complaining that using aperture priority mode to ensure it is wide open to complaining that there is too much noise in my picture even with a 135mm f/1.8 lens wide open. ffs if I even used shutter priority, you'd be complaining that you either cant see anything because it is all a blur, shooting moving subjects at 1/5th shutter speed, hand held on a 135mm lens without IS/VR/OS, or that i'm just posting black boxes because the ISO is at 64 at night on a side street.
>>3788735how retarded are you? Lets assume I shot
>>3784422 which is what you're complaining about in shutter priority at 1/250th a second and f/8. That would be 5 stops less light than 1/160th a second and f/1.8, and ISO would have to gone from 4500 to 144k on a camera which maxes out at 25k, in a thread in which people are crying about noise when it is 5-7.2k.
>F8 and be thereis a cope for poors with shitty glass or those so new that they lack a basic understanding of how DoF works.
