>>3144873Sometimes nice stuff came through, and we'd show it to the others.
But tbrqhwy most of the stuff was typical /p/ shit.
Never made any personal copies or extra prints of nice stuff if that's what you mean.
>>3144880By fucked up film I mean when people give you rolls that are either not exposed at all, or extremely under or over exposed, which you can tell without even looking for it.
Sometimes I'd look at the negs to judge their quality, especially after mixing new developer and such. Of course you can tell what was shot from looking at the negative, but I didn't take the time to look at every one of them, like
>>3144881says.
