>>3562857What leaps out at me is how the only tactic you have against me isn't truth, but strawmanning and red herrings. The fact that no one is convinced by your idiocy is enough to clue you in that you're just wasting your time. No one takes DP review seriously. They fuck up their studio comparisons routinely and even admitted as much, paraphrasing "while we do our best, our workload is high enough that we can't gurantee we didn't miss something, like missed focus"
The fact that they use that obviously bad copy of the 45 1.8 for their entire Olympus lineup until the EM1X, while they use top of the line glass for almost every other manufacturer, is evidence enough that their results should be discarded.
I can prove to you CONCLUSIVELY that essentially EVERY Olympus result on DP review should be discarded. Here's the EM1X vs. the EM1 Mk II. They're the exact same sensor. They have the exact same image processors. They are for all intents and purposes, the exact same camera. The only difference here is the glass.
I will shit down your throat again if you like.
