>>3558997If you wanted to go wide angle I would have gone even wider angle (18-20mm equiv), picked an interesting (but lower lying) dead bush for foreground interest like you have done here
>>3558783, but then set your camera higher and angle the camera downwards.
Or pick a patch of barren grass without any brambles but with interesting texture like the swirly bit in pic related, and emphasize that as foreground interest.
But when you try to use a wide angle to "capture everything" all you end up with is shitty, boring, compromise
