>>2898753>Really even that is too much>but I'm going to go all-in on the Nikon outfitSo you're still in GAS even when /p/ told you to be sensical about your possesion?
>all my Canon glass wasn't stolen and I sold it off to pay for a DfWhy not keep the Canon lenses? Why a fucking Df when a D810, a 5DS or a A7R are better? Do you FUCKING NEED IT?
>The D7000 was bought for meYou were cucked with an old baby sensor camera like an embarassing christmas present?
>by a fellow driver who owed me a large sum of moneyToo bad it doesn't stop you from buying anything more.
>I told him if he buys me either a Df or Tamron 15-30 + some sort of Nikon ED bazooka lens we would be squared up>still in the hole 1500 bucks >we would be squared upDoesn't compute.
>I've debunked time and time again this whole notion that Sugar never takes photosYour amount of shitpost is 10x of actual photos. You repost your photos ad nauseam. You haven't improved a bit since your "clever chemical watermark" phase.
>>2898788Is this picture supposed to be a decent rebuttal?