>>3246816nope
>>3246814bad
>>3246813why
>>3246742this definitely has something to it, the chaotic, distorted sky, the helicopter, the expression of the man in front, it is a weird and surreal scenery. what exactly was it that you shot there?
>>3246699hm it doesn't rly do it for me. these are two people skiing and one is illumated brightly from behind. nope, I try to but I can't find this interesting.
>>3246632>>3246629>>3246627the middle one is ok because it shows a nice expression and the light is decent. however it indicates a story but doesn't give any more information about it which is unsatisfying. also the microphone is extremely annoying.
>>3246493nothing
>>3246485pretty cool. the old man in black and suit, stiffly standing in front of the energetic manga art - a nice little story, a well caught contrast. I'd like a bit more contrast (looks too greyish) and more sharpness on his hand, the photo overall lacks crispness.
>>3246480decent, not great, not bad at all though. well composed, nice work with the lines, nice colors. imagine if a bright red item like a can of coke was in middle of the parking slot, that would do the trick I think. this way it feels a bit too empty.
>>3246477nice idea but you should have chosen another angle. if you were on the same height as the center of your picture this could work pretty well. this way it just doesn't look graphical enough for a photo that wants to look graphical.
>>3246473doesn't do it for me, there is no focus (in composition I mean), no structure, no lead of the eye, it's just a big chaotic mess.
>>3246470>>3246471>>3246472give your subjects more space and compose the lines in your pictures more carefully
>>3246433bad light and no composition
>>3246393pretty much what the other guy said. straighten it, sharpen it, fix the exposure, fix the iso, start to not look on unedited pictures as a finished picture. the subject is cool, shoot again and this time actually try.
