>>2891971I only edited it to show the tonal range better so people could judge the dev. I normally edit for higher contrast. But have at it if you want and see if the scan is usable to get the result you would have wanted;
https://we (period) tl/GJpETgfbCm
>>2892033I adore mine. Stopped using any other SLRs I have after I found it in a box of randoms cameras I bought. Should be backwards compatible with KA-mount.
