>>3683335The R6 is a 20.1MP camera with larger light-wells than the R5 and none of the misery associated with using a high resolving sensor that demands only the finest and most expensive glass to be useful.
The R6 also has -6.5EV (the R5 has -6EV like the EOS R).
The R6 handles high ISO better than the R5.
The R6 handles lowlight better than the R5.
The R6 has IBIS to 8 STOPS.
The R6 has 1/8000 sec shutter speed.
The R6 is cheaper than the R5 and can still render 4K video without so much of a crop as the R.
The R6 has eye tracking for people, animals, fish, birds, cats, dogs and presumably zooplankton.
The R6 had one hell of a lot less cost associated with the Battery Grip than the R5.
The R6 doesn't require expensive storage for video like the R5 does. The R5 requires CFexpress cards for one of the slots.
In terms of dollar value, the R6 is leagues ahead of the R5.
How about that sensor-protecting shutter screen on the R6? No more filthy sensors!
R6 has weather sealing just like the EOS 6D series.
The R6 has a new battery that redirects energy to different electronics zones and components inside the camera - to reduce overheating when shooting in 4K.
If you shoot in 8K, your best solution for Apple Mac editing is their latest Mac Pro with a 6K editing screen that has a $999 stand just to hang the $7000 monitor on. Did I mention the Mac Pro when kitted out with the right number of 28 Cores will cost AUS $78,099 with free delivery (not including the monitor or stand or wheels or software)?
Isn't Sony still pushing out 12MP sensors for use in their new A7sIII Full Frame cameras? Sure, it means they can shoot for longer without overheating... but at 12MP it's not longer a photographic tool. It's a tool for tools who don't care about image quality. Go cry in your pillow.