>>3572273> Fuji X-T3 vs Sony A7 series> vs Sony A7 series> Sony A7 seriesdude its 10 cameras in sony a7 series, from 6 years span, how you can compare Fuji X-T3 with some "Sony A7 series"
sony a7 (i own it for a few years) is great camera for 2013 but now pretty outdated, but still 100% worth its cost (for used on ebay), it's full frame mirorrless, it have lack of iso, its one stop worse than 5dm2 but still its 2013 full frame mirroless, though it have great dynamical range (on images that will not suffer from noise)
sony a7m2 is a7 with IBIS and better af
sony a7m3 is complete different. its 5dm4 in mirorrless case basically (but without 1.74 crop in 4K haha). awesome sensor that can do 12800 iso. awesome af. awesome dynamical range. awesome af. its completly different camera
its also exist a7r a7r2 a7r3 a7r4 a7s a7s2 a9 a9m2 which all are totally different cameras in same body
HOW CAN YOU COMPARE Fuji X-T3 vs Sony A7 series?
Fuji X-T3 is great for its purpose. but comparing it to a7m3 it have no chances. and first a7 have no chances against Fuji X-T3, i think its obvious
sony e mount have terrible lack of budget lenses. if you bought it you will stuck with 1-2 lenses cause you woudnt be able to buy more basically. but still full frame mirorrless and benefits of sony e system worth it.
if you need ability to use old cheap good lenses i.e. old 50 1.4 from ebay that would cost 10x times less than on sony e mount - go with nikon z / canon rf. with adapter you will get all the old lenses with 100% working af
on the other hand we talked about Fuji X-T1 here. if you look iso comparison by dpreview you can think - thats a good isos. no man its not. fuji uses noise reduction in RAW. you would get noiseless but completely blurred images.
for IQ i'd prefer first sony a7 over Fuji X-T1
and last word: i dont know much about fuji lens prices but i guess nobody here can be worse than sony. sony e mount lenses are awfully overpriced
