>>4139267>claims others are copingyou literally ARE coping AND youre also in denial to enforce your cope
youre literally denying CLEAR and VISIBLE superiority in image quality
>It doesn't matter if i missed focus1. didnt miss focus in any of my images
2. no, focus doesnt matter when looking at the image and looking at rendering
are we arguing about focus or image quality? which one is it? kek
>it's supposed to be low resolution>implying the image is low resolution as if that somehow matters when looking at image quality and renderingthe original image was shot on a7riv, this is a print screen so you cant see my name in the exif file
also, dont bother with reverse image search these are all ''unusable'' aka fail images i didnt give to models/clients or post anywhere else
>It's supposed to be low contrast>-35 contrast>-18 saturation>-10 clarityuhhhhhh.... yes?!
>it's not flaring, it's "LiGhT gLoW:ok what im getting from this whole reply is
cope
cope
excuses
cope
denial
more cope
more denial
and an ''im a shit photographer and i dont know whats editing'' vibe
chuckle.
(also, please go ahead and post some of your own chinese lens images.lets see that same rendering that my 100 year old lenses have.)
(i got 500+ more to post, that i took just with this single haselblad lens alone)
i ahve to go shower now, have to go buy a new laptop and got another shoot in 3 hours.
see ya later aligator keep on coping and making excuses while until im back :D:D
