>>4493828They’re not that bad desu. Forgettable and that’s perfect fine for snapshits/test images.
For the first one,
>>4493807, I would have liked the goat side profiles to be tighter together, maybe have more of the front of their faces too. Bokeh is dizzying and unappealing for this shot imo. This dizzying effect and the fact that the goats aren’t entirely in focus would have been fixed if they closed down the aperture but I’m guessing this was a photo to test the bokeh. Idc if the goats are entirely in frame or not so I have no comment there.
For the second one,
>>4493816, the oof kid in the background is a little too close to the edge imo. Maybe if they’d captured the trio to form a triangle closer to equilateral the composition would have been better. (Meaning the kid being closer to that high point of the rock outcropping.) Otherwise the goats are fine as they are.
For the last one,
>>4493824, comp is fine for me. Focus is fine I guess, I’d have liked for both legs to be in focus but I guess you need to make compromises.
They’re not terrible and they’re okay for test shots, even almost pleasing. I’d understand you being upset if these were in a gallery in SoHo but they’re not so chill.
Anyway, another night shot. Feel free to critique, I know they’ve got flaws but I love them. I liked how the streetlights put a spotlight on graffiti.
