>>4385948Ah I'm fuckin sorry I generalised instead of explaining the entirety of RAW and bayer info to someone asking a simple question in a /sqt/ thread.
How about this, retard: Okay anon, if you want to shoot B&W photos it's VERY IMPORTANT that you understand EVERYTHING about demosaiacing, bayer interpolation, pixel binning etc. etc.
You simply CANT just generalise and say that if you import a RAW into your PC for post processing that it's going to default to a non-B&W image. Sorry anon, it's just not that simple because this chucklefuck wants to jerk off his knowledge about the fact that RAWs are just data really.
It's a fucking bayer sensor, it's going to read the RAW according to bayer logic no-matter what step you convert to B&W. The only way to get better results is to use a monochromatic sensor.
