>>4480876>Almost a thousand fucking dollars for 16mp of effective resolution, dogshit autofocus and no IBISpathetic.
a canon EOS R50 fucking mogs this
should fuji, inc be fined for running an actual scam?
>inb4 they enabled some video codec almost no one usessomething everyone who lives on photo forums needs to remember is almost nobody buys fujifilm in real life. they are ONLY visible on the internet.
fujifilm is a lot like linux. no one can post on a tech forum without constantly hearing about linux and how good it is, you cant watch tech youtube without constantly hearing about linux... but in real life, 99% of people don't use and haven't heard about linux, because linux is not actually a good desktop operating system, and all those internet people are lying, non-stop, and ignoring glaring issues.
fujifilm doesn't make good cameras, and they aren't popular outside of their social media shill algo bubble. they have 7% market share and almost all of it is the x100 meme camera (which is, itself, definitely not a good camera, it just looks slightly better than phone photos). if om system had better marketing, hired a random youtube to put his lightroom presets on the camera, and added larpeture rings to lenses, i'm convinced fujifilm would all but go out of business because the shitty little om-5 somehow manages to have noticeably better IQ than 40mp xtrans.
