>>4387556even with a better lens I still don't quite like the look and lack of resolution from the huge fucking grains in Tri-x
this is Tri-X pushed to iso 800 with my Nikon FM2 and a 50mm f/1.4 lens
way better than the Rollei but still kinda shit
I think I just don't like Tri-X
>btw question to people who shoot large formatis Tri-X 320 much different from regular Tri-X we have in 35mm?
a camera store guy told me they're very different, and from what I've seen the grain is way more subtle, but I believe that's simply because it's fucking large format after all
is Tri-X 320 really different? how?
