>>3780534That's not my point, people notice up close even if you use a phone.
The myth of the stealthiness of a small camera needs to be buried. Small cameras are better for street because they're >the one you have with you.
You don't something cumbersome or bulky enough that you need to take it around. If you want to snap from a distance on the street then MFT is probably the answer, they look inoffensive with their lenses and maybe you have a 200mm equivalent.
Pic related are:
>GX9 with Lumix G Vario 35-100mm f/4-5.6 APSH Mega O.I.S. (70-200mm equivalent)>A7III with E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS >90D with EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM (29-216 equivalent)I picked the Panasonic first and then the closest and most compact equivalents I could find. Couldn't find a normal zoom for the canon in the comparison, would be a bit more compact than the nearly superzoom I think. The 70-200 for the Sony I didn't bother with because of two reasons: they were G lenses (stupidly expensive) and they are huge.
