>>3994165>450 euros, basically newThat's much more reasonable than the 1000 bucks Fuji sold it for originally
Not implying it's a bad lens but overall not quite what you'd want for landscape or astro while the f/2.8 is optically on par except for aperture. Wish Fuji would at least give us one really well-balanced UWA for all the 50/80mm FFE with giant apertures they've been dishing out recently
>>3994168Noice
That was my third lens after the XC 15-45 mm and the XF 27 mm and I refuse to exchange it for either the 50-140 or the 70-300
One of the best value for money at least when bought used
