Nothing interesting to post so here's this from tonight,
>Lens: Tamron 12.5-75mm f/1.8>F-stop: f/8>FL: 12.5mm setting, but lens is reversed.>Insect: Chalybion californicum>Handheld pic>>3343705>tfw no one comments on the OP photo>>3349369I like to composition and contrast of color.
>>3349464Love it. It embodies so many projected statements.
>>3349597I'd like this more if there weren't 6 of those near this area making the night sky really bright for the past few years.
>>3349600I think the post processing make it look quite a bit like plastic, which of course enhances the cosplay effect. I prefer the one of her standing with normal eye color and better pose.
>>3349725Not interesting.
>>3349726Very interesting. This is the best one. It is near perfect. I'd only add some contrast to the sky to bring out a little bit of its color, but that's all.
>>3349727>>3349728These need to be exposure bracketed HDRs so the sun isn't washing out most of one photo and the street has more detail instead of being too dark.
>>3349745Love it, but there's something off about it. Perhaps too much of the fog/smoke has dissipated to the point where it more obscures evenly instead of being more tendril-like. Regardless, it is great.
>>3349748It certainly needs it. Though, it isn't a very interesting photo.
>>3349757As already stated, the subject being partly out of frame detracts the most. Having the middle body in focus while progressively getting streaked towards the edges is a nice effect. It would also be better as a landscape orientation I think.
>>3349766Just another cat pic. The sharpness is nice at least, which would be lost had you resized to 1k. The one in
>>3349757 would benefit with resizing, but this one wouldn't.
>>3349787Not all that bad, but with butterflies, it is best to get a perpendicular broadside pic so that the DOF is right across the entire wing evenly for these shots, unless you need some artistic effect of course.
