>>4225449they are meant to look like a design once used by a fashion company but not so much like one that its lawsuit worthy
you're free to guess which one.
fuji still attracts this kind of aspirational "my super premium $3000 seiko is just like your rolex oh hold on let me resync it to
time.is" kind of person. i have no idea why someone would want to look rich, with fashion trappings that are only recognizable to the rich, and thus instantly recognizable as fake should someone be familiar with what its supposed to be, and not even particularly respectable ones (among rich friends you would be openly mocked for buying a leica or a rolex, and i know this for a fact, because i'm rich friends, and someone in my group is still getting laughed at for buying a semi-expensive gibson les paul knockoff that's essentially an illegally styled epiphone).
dont be that guy. honestly the "i'm pretty happy with my tissot" guy is more likely to be friends with the "i have a rolex" guy. just embrace the fact that you have a fuji.
