>>4372578I think it's a wonderfully composed image that has a lot going for it. I invite you as is board tradition to post your own photography if you're going to provide meaningful critique. But thank you for your astute observation that specular highlights lack detail.
I like it because I don't need to correct it in any dimension. I don't know where you get the impression that it's unusable without a bunch of processing. That hasn't been true in my experience. Maybe that's the difference here: your opinion is formed from reading and mine is from daily use.
