>>2989726That's not how that works in the real world, usually it goes along the lines of the person marching over and starting the conversation with "did you just take a picture of me" or "delete that picture". Usually I'll just say no, that there's no way to check and just walk away.
When you refuse it usually escalates fairly quickly to threats of violence, screaming and calling the police. If you try to walk away or continue they'll stop you again until the police arrive. When that happens on my side I get to tell the officer that they were unhappy that a picture was taken while on public property and I wasn't following them and that I have no intentions of selling the photo or using it for commercial work, the officer will then usually ask to see the photo if that's okay and I agree. It then goes one of two ways from this point:
>The officer informs them that taking a picture in a public place is perfectly legal and they accept itor
>The officer informs them that taking a picture in a public place is perfectly legal and they lose their shit, usually followed by hitting the officer and being arrested.If you're a rude person and treat people in a rude way then usually the gamble doesn't pay off. If you're someone with manners, you'll be fine. Interestingly enough it's usually women and younger males under 30 who do this the most. Mostly it's other women and young uneducated males who act this way.
>>2989736>he is a cunt who doesn't understand basic human decency and doesn't respect people's privacy and the simple fact that someone might not like him taking pictures of them.It's not nice to call someone names anon and it's not nice to misgender someone and it's not like they're in a public place. I don't see how I'm a cunt for not deleting a picture or destroying film just because someone asked, humans have free will to do what they want and I'm acting within the law. I understand basic human decency though, I'm not enslaving someone.
