>>3110519Thank you for your feedback.
>comfy, too bad with the weird artifactsI know, like I said much of the film was rekt by heat and/or scanners. I've had a hell of a time editing some of these (pic very much related). I'll revisit some of them later and try to clear them up.
>what film is this?2 first ones are Portra 160 (yeah, even the second), the last one is Cinestill 800.
Thanks again for taking the time to look through and voicing opinions.
