>>3651781That dude is paid by basedny to shill FF and make his viewers or any other normie/beginner to Consooooom.
All sensors have the same amount of light absorption.
FF has a larger surface area, which means the lenses need to be bigger for it.
Bigger lenses means more light coming in, which means brighter pictures at a lower iso.
If you put a FF lense on an aps-c, m43, or cell phone camera you would get the exact same exposure, since exposure is controlled by the lense not the sensor or camera.
The difference is who has better post processing.
And lets not forget that Sony makes the APSC, M4/3 and over 70% of cell phone camera sensors, and nearly all full frame censors.
So if something truly was inferior, companies wouldn't be using it.
Always wondered why sony pictures look soulless? Because Sony doesnt have good programmers for post processing. Take a look at the google pixel phones, they don't even have zoom and it takes better photos than an A6500 using a 12mp sony sensor.
>tl:drPretty much sensor wars are dick measuring contests that gearfags create and participate in, in order to show that they aren't as much of a poorfag as the dude next to them, all while their gear collects dust on the table next to them, while they post on various mongolian basketweaving forums to cope with the poor investment decision they just made.
