>>3863208Why are you so disingenuous? When I said "they even did X" it was an example of the extremes they went into making it retro, sacrificing a good grip and dial for that objective. To deny the KP goes for a retro look demands a lot of self-delusion. You argue in bad faith.
https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/hands-on-reviews/hands-on-with-the-new-pentax-kp.html>While the retro looks might not be for everyone, for me it's love at first sight. Pentax has a history of making cameras that look as good as they perform, and the KP continues that tradition. >The KP has been under development for a few years and was designed with a retro look in mind from the start. The prism top was an aesthetic choice meant to match the K-1 flagship camera. It's unknown if this signals a direction for future designs, but it does fit the KP well. 