Funny that this thread should be made. I was just snooping around here after having been absent for a few years. Wondering if it's it still as lame as it used to be. Don't know why I feel the need to check when I already know the answer.
>>3688582This is a good analysis. And taking photos requires a lot more effort than playing video games or listening to albums, so there is a somewhat higher energy requirement for quality content.
>>3688671rip bass. I remember when you were new.
>>3689228You are a good photog, your mantis series was nice.
I think when I started here d and ac were still posting. I think I spoke with isi and some others a fair bit in the IRC. Who was the dude who just took abstract pictures of the sky and building rooftops? Posted a ton for a while.
I tried to cultivate better board content for a while by nurturing the daily photo threads and offering lots of critique. I don't think I changed much.
