>>2873688*816mm
I'd say the difference you perceive is more down to you scanning that much area with a 24mp sone, and me scanning more than 3 times (definitely not more than 10 times...) the area with two 18mp rabal shots.
And also that shot of the bay being underexposed by about half a stop, and handheld off a ship at 1/15th.
But I don't think you get what I'm talking about as far as IQ standards. There's visible grain in the shirt and background of your 700px vertical test shots earlier in the thread.
Pic related is a better exposure at full 2 shot stitched res (27ish-mp?) with what I'd consider to be a clean reproduction ratio inset.
>>2873755ask objective provia-san
