>>3632654if you mean something like the Ritz, i dunno maybe, but theyre gonna charge way, WAY more than we would charge #1, #2 my clients are usually brokers for properties so they need material for to market their clients' properties to other prospective buyers. They need it to be enticing within that constraint - if they wanted something more then we can do that but we'd have to pay.
see pic related - was hired to do this but this same angle has been shot a trillion times over the last 140yrs, they dont need it to be the absolute best version of all those trillion, they just need it to be good enough (and consistent with the rest of the 300 images I delivered, AND expediently)
>>3632396>haloingwtf are you talking about? You mean the window tint on the window that is there to keep sun rays minimized?? get a clue
>>3632643when he said scrub i had a slight hope he actually recognized my dr cox reference. guess not..
