>>3320438These last two are from a, "Tamron 70-210mm f/4 w/Macro option," lens I bought off ebay in a lot of lenses "for parts". The "Macro" only goes to 1:4. So, it is really a close up lens at best. It is fairly clear for being the cheapest feeling lens I've ever tried. It is super light weight and plastic. Like the Sears one from
>>3318551 I popped the old mount off and put a Nikon F-mount on it. Both lenses can focus to infinity after the conversion. This lens performs a lot better than the Sears one, which is to be expected for a Tamron.
