>>3947142>>3947144>>3947150>>3947152>Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Correcting flaws, some color adjustments, and other minor edits are acceptable.So sky replacement and fake birds are “minor edits” and not deceptive? I suppose the sky replacement job on
>>3947142 >>3947144 is so poor that you could argue it doesn't even qualify as deceptive. Still a very poor reflection on Wikipedia. Many of the others have had Flickr Boomer landscape HDR cooking and other garish, unrealistic edits. I can't trust any of those photos not to be a significant departure from what was actually there.
