>>3007951Blame the new photographer who can't handle a little bit of criticism on his photos who must reply.
>>3007953I'm sorry senpai, I hope you never have to go through having to be in the same room as your bad parents ever again. h-have a snapshit just for you.
>>3007949>I'm all for my stuff being critiqued.Good.
>That's why I posted it.Good.
>But you don't critique. You just say dickhead shit based purely off personal taste and almost no technical or photography related sense.-but that's the exact opposite of what's happened here. You've been presented with criticism on your post processing and your framing which are 100% based off of the technical elements in your image. Take it to heart and try and sort the negative space issue next time.
In return, also have this snapshit which to my knowledge I've never posted here before because technically it's utter trash. Framing is kind of sloppy and a willingness to get on with finishing the roll led to me going trigger happy.
I'm glad you learned that "art" also has subjective elements. The difference is that I commented on objective elements in your photograph and not the subjective elements.
