>>3235670>i think you're entirely responsible for your output, because you finally figured out a consistent look. only took you like, six years or whatever.Strange. I feel like you'd be whining about inconsistency if I were posting my other aesthetic trappings instead of just the magenta sky works.
I've been consistent for a very long time; I pursue several different styles (some more actively than others at different periods) and sometimes my threads end up with a mix of one and the other.
It's very weird to me and says something about your default psychology that you read into 9 images of one aesthetic and 1 of another that the creator is incapable of consistency, instead of the more likely scenario that not all works were interrelated.
>i was really just responding to your lame call for "duplicate my look you silly boys! ;^)" as if it was some cryptic, impossible-to-duplicate aesthetic when literally anyone who has spent more than a year with a camera could figure it out.And yet you failed to actually accomplish the task *or* fully explain the colors used. You spoke generically, and now you're upset that I'm not making the assumption that there's knowledge behind your generalizations.
I guess I know why you're trying to draw a firm dividing line between my use of color theory and "my camera's thinking."
