Quoted By:
Now I have never ever had a camera(only the one on the celly) but this is my humble opinion regarding digital vs film.
With film you are very limited in the amount of shots you can take and your pictures aren't "neutral" so if you wanted to go for an exact look you'd be at a disadvantage.
But that also means that your shots come out with a character of their own, no color grading needed.
This character always seems to be sincere and non intrusive, always very natural(even though the colors are not true to real life).
Digital means you can take pretty much as many pictures you want. Easy to handle and easy to "develop".
Just pop it into lightroom and do your tweaks and you're off. And with your pictures being very neutral this is even easier, allegedly.
But anyone who's ever tried making a dull "neutral" digital shot look vibrant and alive will tell you its damn hard to do. The reasons are many but a big one I think is that you try to do what "nature(chemistry and physics)" do for you when you use film and it just ends up looking fake.
It's a bit like when you try to make something look old by scuffing it up and staining it with some solution; it never ends up looking quite right, not like the real thing that's aged on its own.
That is why I think film is better.
My pretentious rant is over.
Pic related is the film one vs one that i coloured in after effects.
