>>4266662People hate zooms because they have flat rendering, bleh flare, weird color cast, rendering that changes throughout the zoom range, and soft edges. Really, really good primes cost just as much money. For the price of a zoom with issues (thats every zoom), you can get a perfect prime.
>Yeah, those are just the two biggest professional groups of photographers, lol.He has a point. Its awful soulless work and leaves the same mark on history as driving for doordash. Have you ever even done it? it sucks. ooooh $3000 for 2 nights of work oooooooh man imagine being so desperate for cash but averse to work or risk. Go on, ask your parents if they remember their wedding photographers name. If they even had one. You get into weddings because you like raiding snack bars and talking to overemotional women (or if you're a jew trying to justify his hobby), not because you love photography. And it's never produced anything of value. Yeah let me hit up the MCNY and look at all those awesome wedding photos shot on an r5 and 28-70 f2. The world remembers photographers that do... this, over and over and over again. And over and over again. And over and over again.
Sports photography is even worse. It's already almost fully automated with camera drones. AI piloting them is next. An admission that humans don't even need to hold the cameras to follow the quarter back and spam snapshits. You don't become a sports photographer because you love photography, you become a sports photographer so you can get better seats at sports games.
