>>2924684>Noise is not an issue and it's preposterous to claim to see it at the posted size you foolish yokelsee crop attached, definitely no loss of detail there due to noise and lack of colour information.
>>2924686It just means that a shot underexposed by 2 stops at base iso (for this example 100), then pushed, should look the same as if the shot was
taken at iso 400 in the first place.
>>2924691No, that's just OP stalking someone that makes fun of their photos and posting their partners name.
It's probably a new low for /p
