>>2853457one thing is film emulsion is always a perfected formula for capturing certain kinds of pictures. Digital is very much seen as a blank canvas - when you have your RAW photo, every look is possible done in post processing.
This is not true, as processing will always be limited to the software you're using. Vsco makes money because their film emulation is advanced enough.
One thing exists, though, which is critically different from digital to film: whereas film gradually slows its receival of light the longer it captures it, digital just adds light values continually until it hit a peak and then all data at that point is lost because that point has burned out.
That could explain the more sophiscated way film treats light.
