>>4392769>art IS aestheticsAgreed, he has that dialed up in his colour work
>You comparing these highly stylistic images with stock photography is bafflingWhy? great stock photographers were very good
>Show me a single stock photographer with this much coherent styleSure, months ago an anon dumped pic related and related works
>Show me a single photographer who was doing this style before himOK, you are requesting too much when i can only upload a single picture. It has been done before, doesn't mean he isn't good. Julius Shulman is a decent example.
>photographing the interior like its a landscapeI understand you, but that's called architecture photography, nothing groundbreaking and so far this all sounds very pretentious, i understand the study of landscape affected by man and the semiotics of the architectural language
>cold unhuman spaces of modernityWrong, only a subhuman would think otherwise.
