>>4146982>no fucks given about composition, no fucks given about framingYou just don't get his composition and framing, which are crutches for bland subject matter anyways.
>no fucks given about subject placementHis subjects look like they were placed exactly where he wants them. What you have is bitter jealousy that so many of his photographs look like frames out of a Joost film.
>thinking about colors? lighting? background and environment? There's a very obvious palette in most of his shots. The lighting is also masterfully used to separate the protagonists from their background.
>story telling? not even once.Meme, all that means is you take a snapshit and retcon a story to lend it credence. Case in point, Cohen and Winogrand.
Vid related, 4:14 this degenerate pseud tries to make it seem like his snapshit has any value because muh beautiful broken edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qcgEnC3bLY>wait!! wait!! what about... NO... not a single fucking thought about anything before pressing that shutter button!You're just insulting what you deep down know to be full of purpose. Not one subject in Eggy's work is bland or uninteresting, and it's well known that subject matter reigns supreme in the world of photography.
>didnt think ill find something lower tier than street photography I still don't think anyone can.
>and paparazzi shots of celebs Nothing wrong with that.
>creepy iphone tier snapshits of people on the streetYou're projecting your creepiness. Show me the 150mm iPhone by the way. It's not just a street but an open air mall by the way.
>>4146986>cockroach forelegs typed thisFuck off Mehmet.
