>>4398280>>4398281actually there isnt any fog in them, they look just right when I put a light behinf them and look at just the right angle but they are too thin for scanner to pick up, tried like this kodak quickscan or something like that I use for quickly previewing rolls and then dslr scan I use for better pictures and it picked up the fucking texture of the backlight better than whats on film
>>4398282they're so cooked it probaby wont hurt to try
like this is what the scan looks ooc from the dslr
like the histogram just peaks in the middle of the medium gray
