>>3459510No he is still somewhat retarded.
>Whenever someone mentions Canon's f/1.2L primes or f/1.0 50mm an optical engineer points out that these were possible "because of the mount width"This had nothing to do with the mount's width, but everything to do with the mount's new 20mm flange.
Watch as this goes by completely uncontested, because nobody outside shitposting forums will claim this.