>>4338778Phones suck due to overprocessing.
A lot of digishits suck, but there are quite a few interesting ones, and some with really good image quality.
Pic related is from one of the ones I have with a interesting character. It's not good image quality for sure, but I like the photos I get from it.
The images I've posted above I consider pretty good image quality wise from a 2008 cam.
>>4338800It pisses me off how much phone cameras suck when they don't have to. I recently got a pixel which can shoot RAW, but the image is somehow so soft I have to hit the sharpening to 80 otherwise it looks like I actually missed fucking focus. The RAW also somehow looks unnatural and overprocessed as well.
