>>4205257>that shitEven fuji was not shameless enough to do a 1 to 1 ripoff of a leica. They just copied the design language and weighted the front view in the same way so the X100 series could be easily mistaken for one. JFC.
>>4205268and then, their only stroke of creativity, still being recycled 36 years later since the first EOS cameras in 1987. Canon is a joke.
Meanwhile the X-T*, as much as you might want to call it a mishmash of prior designs from olympus/nikon/pentax, as awful as the ergonomics and colors and resolution are - is at least original and cool looking. It's the archetype, "a real camera", in the minds of all the people too young to have seen widespread cameras other than point and shoots.
