>>2942427>I just found it stupid to imply that either of the lower Canon 50mm weren't sufficient or that the 1.2 is necessary for great portraits.I don't know how you could have possibly read that implication in what I said at all.
I'm a step beyond that. I'm saying that's what CANON is gaming on most consumers viewing the difference as.
>>2942430here's your (((Boo))).