>>3169251I didn't know about that! That might be a good solution, yeah.
But I guess I was thinking I could use the QX10 to kind of test my resolve to use a more "real" camera more frequently. I mean, the QX1 looks cool but it's also $300 more minimum and I'd still need to buy a lens.
I have commitment issues, obviously.
Here's an example of a smartphone pic I took. I'm living in an area where I have some really nice photo opportunities, and I'd like to do more, but I'm also kinda lazy about it.
Is the QX1 actually good, for the kind of fucked up thing that it is? Could it really just replace a mirror less?