>>4171634I sadly fucked that one up on accident. I caught the mistake before you, because dpreview does tell you what you are actually looking at. And you can go to their website yourself, download the raws, etc. Is giving the XH2s a 1EV advantage to compensate for the slightly higher ISO fair?
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=fujifilm_xh2&attr144_1=fujifilm_xh2s&attr144_2=nikon_z6ii&attr144_3=nikon_z7ii&attr146_0=125_6&attr146_1=160_5&attr146_2=100_5&attr146_3=64_6&attr177_0=off&attr177_1=off&attr177_2=off&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=835&x=0.8588512628624885&y=0.23610046511627905>>4171633You can't be taken seriously if you don't like your youtube video source for context and most importantly, data and trustworthyness
Otherwise it's even more worthless than your article of worthless, nondescript claims because nobody knows what they're actually looking at. But yes the full frame cameras both retained more detail and more varied color and the canon is the most usable photo by a long shot. Amazing that with 40 megapixels, your $2000 camera can't outperform the level of detail achievable of a $1000 canon RP.
