>>4175036>Zeiss isn't even good.Oh...
Is that why Cooke, Zeiss, SK and Angenieux are by far the most used lenses in film industry - and I'm not talking only Holywood, I'm talking worldwide.
Is that why Zeiss lenses are the main full frame lenses of choice by literally everyone and anyone who has made a name for themselves?
Is that why everyone who shoots Hasselblad and Phase One says that only Zeiss and Leica lenses can replicate the MF look the best?
Is that why every single god tier photographer also has a fucking US army size arsenal of Zeiss lenses behind their art?
You're the same type of uneducated caveman, that would go into a thread where an anon is asking for help on which camera/lens to buy and then proceed to argue with everyone in that thread who's actually giving good advice, about how some shitty, low tier camera/lens YOU think is as good as XYZ and that there's no difference between them... All while EVEN HERE, on god damn 4chan, 90% of EXIF files are of Sony a7 or a6000 series cameras, Canon/Nikon FF DSLRs or film cameras, shot with either Zeiss or Canon/Nikon/Sony native lenses. Even people here on 4chan who actually shoot images with their camera, use what's actually good but I bet you'd still go around, arguing how that anon asking for advice should use a fucking disgrace that is Sigma SD1 with the atrocious Canon 17-85mm f4 lens, because YOU think ''it's as good as Sony a7IV with a Zeiss 55mm f1.8 ZA lens and there's no difference!!!!!''
I guess we're all wrong and we should all sell our Zeiss lenses because some nophoto on 4chan said so... Damn...
