>>4091484>literally meaningless word salad, you're just saying "light goes through lenses" which is the case for every lensyou do realize that a camera lens is just the same as a lens for your glasses right? hell, even glass for glasses can be specifically engineered to reduce some visual impairment defects, medical conditions or whatever else, such as astigmatism or glare sensitivity for example. zeiss and leica literally engineer lenses for glasses for people with astigmatism and glare sensitivity, to the point where the astigmatism and glare effects of patients are reduced by 99% or completely while wearing glasses, all because both companies engineer the lenses for glasses the same way they design camera lenses! Nobody else on the market has that level of effectiveness, only zeiss and leica do.
is that also a zeiss/leica conspiracy and all a made up word salad?! if e.g samyang did the same, surely they would also be able to compete with zeiss and leica while the entire medical eyecare industry cant manufacture lenses even close to zeiss/leica effectiveness. I mean surely they could, because after all, there is no difference between samyang and zeiss lenses, all lenses are the same, its just light passing through a lens... there's no physics or engineering being done to control how the light comes out on the other end. its all the same crap. its just a word salad!
go learn about everything that goes into light control while manufacturing a lens for a camera.
everything from the moment the glass hits a CNC machine, all the way to laser finishing of the glass and coatings. every single manufacturing process is done to control how light comes out the last glass element of the lens and every single bit in how an image looks, can be controlled via lens engineering, this includes your beloved ''3d render'' some manufacturers are just better at it than others, although most lenses made nowadays, have sacrificed that for sharper rendering because of high MP sensors
