>>3405016You are a very stupid person that tautologically will see whatever they want to see regardless of what the reality is. Are you really saying that this
>>3403741 and this
>>3403739 are terrible quality, unusable scans? Like get a fucking grip, man. I demand to see a good photo you have taken. Literally any good photo you have taken because your knowledge here is awful.
This is a constant problem with 4chan, these little fucking subject matter tyrants that try to speak with authority but probably started researching last week.
Here's my guess, you thought about getting a film camera and shooting film sometime last week, then you looked up the prices of everything and found it intimidating to start so now you have convinced yourself that it not only is costly to start but also stupid. Or, even better, maybe you actually bought a bunch of stuff to do film photography but weren't pleased with the results you got so now you're a wounded dog out for blood in the 4chan threads wanting to let everyone know that "If I can't do it, then there must be a problem with the very idea of doing it!"
Pic related: Ektar 100 scanned with the "unusable garbage potato" scanner Epson v600
