>>3342379I think the 1-2 people who did that mostly haven't been around lately. Like those that give the huge list of replies in a single reply, I mean. Otherwise, there's not too much to comment on, which of course is worse than getting bad comments I guess.
>>3342369This is pretty good, but I think it needs to have the exposure brighter a bit. You'd probably need to lower highlights, increase contrast, and raise vibrance and saturation a bit to do that so it wouldn't blow things out. This is what I'm talking about, but I only took like a minute to do this in Camera Raw. It looks like it may have brought out some green-yellow in the fur though that could have been mellowed out.