>>3064755>>3064755>>3065140>>3065153>Yeah, it was the only time a shatbedder has posted actual scans and crops, as far as I've been able to tell.I guess I'll join in then
MF neg, both with the same sharpening applied, both at 100% crop. DSLR is a 4 image stitch, shatbed is an Epson V700 scanned at 3200dpi. The flatbed scanning takes a quarter of the time and IMO produces slightly better results.
These arguments always come down to performance, but never mention the time and money side. I got lucky and scored the epson for $300aud, they usually go for around $500-$600 , and my dslr scan setup also cost around $600, and if I wanted a dedicated macro lens it would cost even more. So you can achieve great results with BOTH, it just depends on how much time, effort and money you're willing to put in.
