>>2964144The way I see it, Shug, you have two potential problems with this shot, either of which explains why it blows. The first problem assumes that the train is the subject. In that case, it's way the fuck underexposed. At that rate, you're just a few stops away from a fucking silhouette. So, if you were shooting the train, you fucked up exposure. The second problem assumes the sky/sunset was the subject. If so, (a) the colors aren't nearly interesting enough to justify that, and (b) you've got too much goddamned shit in the frame to take away from the colors. So, if you were shooting the sky, you fucked up.
Either way, it's a shit shot. It's one of the weakest in the tread.
I don't care if you like that lens. Don't spam this shot for the next 6 months with your parroted "hurr durr tonika wide open no bad" bullshit. It's a fine lens, but this shot doesn't show that at all.
